Joseph Cornett v. Warden Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20202:18-cv-07963California245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH CORNETT, Case No. CV 18-7963-JVS (PD)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

v.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE AND DENYING

WARDEN PARAMO,

CERTIFICATE OF

15 Respondent. APPEALABILITY 16

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, and the Supplemental Statement of Decision. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.