Miguel Soto v. Francisco Ramirez
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20202:20-cv-11057California515 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 20-11057-CJC (MAAx) Date: December 8, 2020
Title: MIGUEL SOTO V. FRANCISCO RAMIREZ, ET AL.
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cheryl Wynn N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY
THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM AND RELATED
STATE LAW CLAIMS
On September 23, 2020, Plaintiff Miguel Soto filed this action against Defendants, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), as well as state law claims for violation of California’s Disabled Persons Act, California’s Unfair Competition Law, and negligence. (Dkt. 1 [Complaint, hereinafter “Compl.”].) Plaintiff contends that this Court has jurisdiction over his ADA claim based on the existence of a federal question and…