Kenyon Darrell Brown v. Daisy Shim

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20205:20-cv-02342California1,237 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION KENYON DARRELL BROWN, ) No. 5:20-cv-02342-RGK-JDE ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. ) WHY THE PETITION ) DAISY SHIM, San Bernardino County ) SHOULD NOT BE ) DISMISSED District Attorney, ) 15 ) Respondent. ) 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION On November 9, 2020, Petitioner Kenyon Darrell Brown (“Petitioner”) filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his 2019 conviction in San Bernardino County Superior Court. Dkt 1 (“Petition” or “Pet.”). The Court has reviewed the Petition consistent with its authority under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court (“Habeas Rules”) and finds that the Petition suffers from at least three defects. The Court therefore orders Petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.