Jasmine Benard Austion v. Alex Villaneuva

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20202:20-cv-10898California1,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASMINE BENARD AUSTION, Case No. 2:20-cv-10898-ODW (AFM) Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

13 v. PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

SHERIFF ALEX VILLANEUVA,

15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on November 20, 2020. According to the petition, Petitioner is currently in state custody awaiting a criminal trial on charges of domestic violence, rape, and resisting arrest. (ECF No. at 2.) Petitioner alleges that he was denied his constitutional rights by (1) the trial court’s denial of a motion to exclude the victim’s inconsistent statements and (2) the trial court’s denial of him motion to dismiss the case. (ECF No. 1 at 5.) Petitioner previously filed a habeas corpus petition in this Court, in which he also sought to enjoin the same state court criminal proceedings. Case No. 2:20-cv- 08741-ODW(AFM). In the prior petition, Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.