William Echemendia v. Subaru of America, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ECHEMENDIA, Case No. 2:20-cv-09243-MCS-JEM 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND [11]
v.
14 SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is a Motion to Remand (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff William Echemendia. Mot., ECF No. 11. Defendant Subaru of America, Inc. filed an Opposition and Plaintiff filed a Reply. Opp., ECF No. 12; Reply, ECF No. 13. The Court deems the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local Rule 7-15. The Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court asserting two claims against Subaru under the Song-Beverly Warranty Act (“SBA”): (1) breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and (2) breach of express warranty. Compl. ¶¶ 14- 34, ECF No. 1-2. Plaintiff’s claims concern a 2016 Subaru WRX (the “Vehicle”) that exhibited defects after he bought it,…