Kyle Evan Petersen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20202:20-cv-01914California768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE EVAN PETERSEN, Case No. 2:20-cv-01914-RGK-MAA Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

AS MOOT AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; P. BRADLEY, Warden, DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

AS MOOT

Respondent. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On February 27, 2020, Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Section 2241”) (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1.) Petitioner raises one claim for Section 2241 relief: that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) exceeded its authority in placing him at the United States Penitentiary in Lompoc, California (“USP-Lompoc”). (Pet. 2–3.2) He states that prison staff members in the psychiatric unit told him that he would not be safe in the prison

P. Bradley, the current Warden of the United States Penitentiary Lompoc, is substituted as Respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). 2 Pinpoint citations in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.