Iradj Forootan v. Smart Disaster Response Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20208:20-cv-00146California282 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

__________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: SACV 20-00146-JLS (DFMx) Date: December 16, 2020 Title: Iradj Forootan v. Smart Disaster Response Technologies, Inc. et al

Present: HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Melissa Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CASE

WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

It appears that this Court may lack subject matter jurisdiction over this action. The Court may raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, sua sponte. See U.S. Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, 487 U.S. 72, 79 (1988). As the party invoking federal jurisdiction, Plaintiff has the burden of establishing the existence of subject matter jurisdiction. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.