Iradj Forootan v. Smart Disaster Response Technologies, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20208:20-cv-00146California282 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
__________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.: SACV 20-00146-JLS (DFMx) Date: December 16, 2020 Title: Iradj Forootan v. Smart Disaster Response Technologies, Inc. et al
Present: HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Melissa Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:
Not Present Not Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CASE
WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK
OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
It appears that this Court may lack subject matter jurisdiction over this action. The Court may raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, sua sponte. See U.S. Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, 487 U.S. 72, 79 (1988). As the party invoking federal jurisdiction, Plaintiff has the burden of establishing the existence of subject matter jurisdiction. …