Juan Carlos Marquez v. Scott Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20205:18-cv-01071California1,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN CARLOS MARQUEZ, Case No. 5:18-cv-01071-JVS-MAA

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, which the Court received and filed on November 20, 2020 (“Objections”). (Objs., ECF No. 34.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. In his Objections, Petitioner reiterates his claim that the prosecution possessed allegedly exculpatory evidence: Petitioner’s dental impressions, a 911 call transcript, and an autopsy report. (Objs. 3.) He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.