Son Hong v. Mary Read

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20208:19-cv-00086California2,695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 SON HONG, Case No. 8:19-cv-00086-RGK-JC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

MARY READ, et al., RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Defendants. [DOCKET NOS. 51, 54, 57] 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative First 18 Amended Complaint, the three Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint 19 (“Defendants’ Motions”), all documents filed by the parties in connection with 20 Defendants’ Motions, and all of the records herein, including the October 26, 2020 21 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and 22 Recommendation”) and plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation 23 (“Objections”). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those 24 portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. 25 The Objections comprise ninety-eight pages in which plaintiff disputes the 26 Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that leave to amend be denied. Plaintiff 27 contends that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.