Evette Estrada v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20202:20-cv-09918California1,835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 4 5 Evette Estrada, 2:20-cv-09918-VAP-SKx 6 Plaintiff, Order DENYING Motion to v. Remand and ORDERING Defendant to Show Cause FCA US LLC, et al., (Dkt. 10). Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff Evette Estrada filed a Motion to Remand the present matter to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. (Dkt. 10). Defendant FCA US LLC filed an Opposition to the Motion, (Dkt. 13), and Plaintiff subsequently replied, (Dkt. 14). The Court deems this matter appropriate for resolution without oral hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7-15. After considering all papers filed in connection to the Motion, the Court DENIES the Motion. The Court also ORDERS Defendant to show cause regarding the amount in controversy. 19 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Evette Estrada filed her initial complaint on August 18, 2020, asserting claims under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“the Act”) relating to her purchase of a 2019 Jeep Renegade. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.