Elijah Smith v. People of the State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJAH SMITH, Case No. EDCV 20-2373 MCS (RAO) Plaintiff, v.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF RE SUMMARY DISMISSAL CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 10, 2020, Plaintiff Elijah Smith (“Plaintiff”), a detainee 18 proceeding pro se, filed a civil complaint (“Complaint”). Compl., Dkt. No. 1. 19 Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis. See 20 Dkt. No. 2. For the following reasons, the Complaint is dismissed without leave to 21 amend. 22 Plaintiff brings this lawsuit against “Mr. Tucker,” “Sheriff Deputy of Los 23 Angeles,” the People of the State of California, and the Safety Branch of El Segundo. 24 Compl. at 3-4. He sues the defendants for “$190, zillion dollars.” Id. at 6. Plaintiff 25 states that the defendants violated his rights at “North Hollywood Mental Health 26 Attorney & Sheriff Department of Los Angeles.” Id. at 2. Defendant Tucker violated 27 his rights “in fault me doing an[] arson,” and Defendant…