Socorro Aide Rodriguez v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20205:19-cv-02069California4,078 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 SOCORRO AIDE R., an Individual, Case No.: 5:19-02069 ADS

Plaintiff,

v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Socorro Aide R.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial of her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) improperly rejected her testimony regarding her

23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. subjective limitations due to her fibromyalgia. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. II. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.