Neeta Gayakwad v. RSCR California, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20202:20-cv-04018California5,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Introduction

On March 20, 2020, Neeta Gayakwad (“Plaintiff”) brought this action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against named Defendants RSCR California, Inc. (“RSCR California”), RSCR Inland, Inc. (“RSCR Inland”), and Res-Care California, Inc. (“Res-Care California”), doing business as RCCS Services (collectively, “Defendants”). See Dkt. 1-3 (“Complaint”). The Complaint advances the following causes of action: (i) violations of California’s minimum wage laws, Cal. Lab. Code §§ 1194, 1194.2, 1197, and 1197.1; (ii) failure to pay overtime wages, in violation of Cal. Lab. Code §§ 510, 1194, and 1198; (iii) failure to timely pay final wages, in violation of Cal. Lab. Code §§ 201, 202, and 203; (iv) failure to reimburse business expenses, in violation of Cal. Lab. Code §§ 2800 and 2802; (v) failure to furnish complete and accurate wage statements, in violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 226(a); (vi) violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 6310; (vii) violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 232.5; (viii) violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 98.6; (ix) violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5; (x) constructive discharge in violation of public policy; (xi) breach of contract; (xii) breach of the implied covenant of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.