Brent Hesselink v. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20208:20-cv-02051California1,860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

ERK,US.DE

BY: CW DEPUTY 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 BRENT HESSELINK, Case No.: SACV 20-02051-CJC(DFMx) 12 Plaintiff, y ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S . MOTION TO REMAND [DKkt. 11] AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF COLUMBUS and DOES 1-100 17 Defendants. 19 )

21 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND 23 Plaintiff Brent Hesselink brings this employment action against Defendant || American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus and unnamed Does. (Dkt. 1-1 ||[Complaint, hereinafter “Compl.’’].) He filed his complaint in California state court 27 || under the California Labor Code’s Private Attorneys General Act (““PAGA”). (Ud. 4 1.) 28 || He alleges several violations of the California Labor Code, including (1) failure to pay all

meal period wages and rest break wages, (2) failure to properly calculate and pay all 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.