Jane D.M. Doe v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20202:20-cv-03218California2,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JANE D.M. DOE, a minor, by and ) Case No. 20-cv-3218 DDP (JPRx) 10 through her Guardian ad Litem, Ivette ) Rodriguez, ) ORDER GRANTING ) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO Plaintiff, ) DISMISS FIRST AMENDED ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES v. ) ) [Dkt. 31] )

) ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, and ) DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) 19 Defendants. ) ) )

Presently before the court is County of Los Angeles’ Motion to Dismiss First

Amended Complaint for Damages. (Dkt. 31, Mot.) Having considered the submissions

of the parties and heard oral argument, the co urt grants the motion and adopts the

following Order.

I. B A C K GROUND

Plaintiff JANE D.M. DOE (“Plaintiff”) “was born on April 11, 2008 and is a minor (“FAC”) ¶ 5.) “Plaintiff is the natural born daughter of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.