Aaron Raiser v. City of Temecula
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 AARON RAISER, Case No. EDCV 19-1465-DSF (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH
CITY OF TEMECULA, ET AL., LEAVE TO AMEND
Defendant(s).
15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Aaron Raiser (“Raiser”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) alleging various violations of his Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Defendants County of Riverside, Wade, Carpenter, Hollingsworth, Deforest, Wood, Gardner, Aguire, and Rodriguez filed a Motion to Dismiss Portions of the Third Amended Complaint. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the TAC with leave to amend and denies the Motion to Dismiss Portions of the Third Amended Complaint as MOOT. /// II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On August 7,…