Pamela Day v. Dustin Boyer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
JS-
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 Case №. 2:19-cv-01669-ODW (RAOx) 11 PAMELA DAY,
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. SET ASIDE DEFAULT
JUDGMENT [33]
14 DUSTIN BOYER, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION The Court previously granted in part Plaintiff Pamela Day’s Renewed Motion 18 for Entry of Default Judgment. (Order Granting Default J., ECF No. 22.) Defendant 19 Dustin Boyer moves to set aside the default judgment. (“Motion”). (Mot. to Set 20 Aside Default J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 33.) The Motion is fully briefed. (See Opp’n, 21 ECF No. 46; Reply, ECF No. 48.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS 22 Boyer’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND 24 A. Factual Background Day and Boyer were involved in a cryptocurrency (“MobileCoin”) investment 26 that fell through. (See Mot. 9–14; Decl. of Dustin Boyer (“Boyer Decl.”) ¶¶ 4–21,
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral…