Steven Alexander Bolden v. Felicia Ponce

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20212:20-cv-04392California2,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN ALEXANDER BOLDEN, Case No. 2:20-cv-04392-JFW (MAA)

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

FELICIA PONCE,

15 Defendant. 1 16

I. SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS On May 15, 2020, Plaintiff Steven Alexander Bolden (“Plaintiff”), a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint alleging violations of his civil rights pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On June 25, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s amended Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration of Support on June 23, 2020. (ECF Nos. 8–9.) On August 17, 2020, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Submit Supplemental to the Complaint” (“Motion”). (Mot., ECF No. 16.) On August 19, 2020, the Court issued an order: (1) denying the Motion; and (2) screening the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b), 1915(e)(2)(B) and dismissing the Complaint with leave to amend (“Order”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.