A. N. v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20212:20-cv-11380California1,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

□□□

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-11380 PA (RAOx) Date January 5, 2021 Title A. N. et al v. Target Corporation et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Gabby Garcia Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER On December 21, 2020, the Court provisionally remanded this action because the Notice of Removal is procedurally defective. (Dkt. 9.) It appeared that Defendant Pacific Cycle, Inc. had not obtained the consent of co-defendant Target Corporation for the removal, nor had Target joined in the removal. (Dkt. 1 (“Notice”) at 1 (“Defendant PACIFIC CYCLE, INC. (“Defendant Pacific Cycle”), by and through its counsel, hereby removes the above entitled action filed by Plaintiffs”).) Therefore, the Court remanded this action to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.