Troy Alexander Sanders v. G. Marshall

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20215:20-cv-00885California262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. EDCV 20-00885-JVS (PD) TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

Petitioner, AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

v. JUDGE AND DENYING A

CERTIFICATE OF

G. MARSHALL, APPEALABLITY Respondent.

19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to that Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that it erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.