Anthony Bouyer v. Ho Suk Kim

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20212:20-cv-08665California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-8665-MWF (SKx) Date: January 7, 2021 Title: Anthony Bouyer v. Ho Suk Kim, et al. Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge

Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

On September 22, 2020, Plaintiff Anthony Bouyer commenced this action against Defendants Ho Suk Kim and Helen Railey. (Complaint (Docket No. 1)). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff must have served the Complaint by December 21, 2020. On October 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Proof of Service (the “POS”) of Summons, Complaint and other case-initiating documents on Defendant Ho Suk Kim. (Docket No. 14). Pursuant to the POS, Defendant Kim’s response to the Complaint was due November 9, 2020. On November 19, 2020, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to show cause (“OSC”) why the action should not be dismissed for lack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.