Richard Haworth v. Patricia v. Bradley

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20212:20-cv-07950California242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD HAWORTH, Case No. CV 20-07950-RGK (PD)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES

PATRICIA V. BRADLEY, Warden, MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent.

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 18 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States 19 Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have 20 been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and adopts it as 21 its own findings and conclusions. 22 As a federal prisoner proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner is 23 not required to obtain a certificate of appealability to appeal to the Ninth 24 Circuit Court of Appeals in this case. See Harrison v. Ollison, 519 F.3d 952, 25 958 (9th Cir. 2008) (plain language of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) does not require 26 federal prisoners bringing section 2241 petitions to obtain a certificate of 27 appealability to appeal, unless the section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.