Ryan Matthew Burd v. James R. Hefflin
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20215:20-cv-02410California367 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 / REMAND
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. ED CV 20-2410-DMG (SHKx) Date January 12, 2021
Title Ryan Matthew Burd v. James R. Hefflin Page 1 of
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER REMANDING CASE TO RIVERSIDE
COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
On December 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) to Defendant James Hefflin as to why this case should not be remanded to Riverside County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [Doc. # 12.] Hefflin, who is proceeding pro se, filed a response on December 23, 2020. [Doc. # 13.]
Hefflin’s response does not establish that Plaintiff Ryan Matthew Burd’s Request for a Civil Harassment Restraining Order arises under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., simply because it asserts that Hefflin harassed Burd on the basis of…