Ryan Matthew Burd v. James R. Hefflin

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20215:20-cv-02410California367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 / REMAND

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 20-2410-DMG (SHKx) Date January 12, 2021

Title Ryan Matthew Burd v. James R. Hefflin Page 1 of

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER REMANDING CASE TO RIVERSIDE

COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

On December 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) to Defendant James Hefflin as to why this case should not be remanded to Riverside County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [Doc. # 12.] Hefflin, who is proceeding pro se, filed a response on December 23, 2020. [Doc. # 13.]

Hefflin’s response does not establish that Plaintiff Ryan Matthew Burd’s Request for a Civil Harassment Restraining Order arises under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., simply because it asserts that Hefflin harassed Burd on the basis of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.