Jean Max Darbouze v. Jim McDonnel

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20212:18-cv-02964California1,059 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JEAN MAX DARBOUZE, ) No. 2:18-cv-02964-CJC (JDE) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING v. ) AMENDED SUPERSEDING ) LOS ANGELES COUNTY ) REPORT AND ) RECOMMENDATION OF SHERIFF, et al., ) ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE Defendants. ) JUDGE 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the Complaint (Dkt. 1) filed by Plaintiff Jean Max Darbouze (“Plaintiff”), Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 15), Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 25), Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. 32), Plaintiff’s operative Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 40, “4thAC”), the Motion to Dismiss the 4thAC (Dkt. 46, “Motion”) filed on July 13, 2020 by the sole Defendant named in the 4thAC, Stephan Christopher (“Defendant”), the assigned Magistrate Judge’s Order that any opposition to the Motion be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.