Columbus Grigsby v. Tecomate Corp

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 COLUMBUS GRIGSBY, Case № 2:19-CV-08735-ODW (KSx)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT [19]

14 TECOMATE CORP D/B/A EL BARON RESTAURANT et al.,

Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Columbus Grigsby moves for entry of default judgment against 19 Defendant Tecomate Corp. dba El Baron Restaurant (“Tecomate”). (Mot. Def. J. 20 (“Motion” or “Mot.”) 1, ECF No. 19.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court 21 DENIES Grigsby’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Grigsby filed this action on October 10, 2019, asserting claims under Title III of 24 the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California state law, relating to his 25 visits to Tecomate’s restaurant on July 8, 2019, and August 28, 2019. (Compl. ¶¶ 10, 26 18–55.) The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Grigsby’s state

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection…