Kevin Enoch v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20212:19-cv-09831California4,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 KEVIN E., Case No. 2:19-cv-09831-JC

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION

v. 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

I. SUMMARY

18 On November 15, 2019, plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for benefits. The parties 20 have consented to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. 21 This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment 22 (“Plaintiff’s Motion”) and defendant’s memorandum in opposition (“Defendant’s 23 Mem.”). The Court has taken the parties’ arguments under submission without oral 24 argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15; Case Management Order ¶ 5. 25 26 1Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted to protect his privacy in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.