Chase Daniel Daugherty v. James R. Hefflin
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20215:20-cv-02496California574 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. ED CV 20-2496-DMG (SHKx) Date January 19, 2021
Title Chase Daniel Daugherty v. James R. Hefflin Page 1 of
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE
SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT
On October 5, 2020, Plaintiff Chase Daniel Daugherty filed a Request for Civil Harassment Restraining Order in Riverside County Superior Court against Defendant James Hefflin. [Doc. # 1-1.] On January 11, 2021, Hefflin removed the action to this Court, asserting federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Not. of Removal [Doc. # 1].
Federal question jurisdiction exists over all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Furthermore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a),…