Nichole Caprice Klocko v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20212:19-cv-08783California4,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 NICHOLE C. K.1, Case No. CV 19-08783-AS Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

For the reasons discussed below, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with this 21 Opinion.

25 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 28 Proceedings 2 On October 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking 3 review of the denial of her application for supplemental security 4 income (“SSI”) by the Commissioner of Social Security 5 (“Commissioner” or “Agency”). (Dkt. No. 1). The parties have 6 consented to proceed before the undersigned United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.