Jared Martin v. R. Fisher, Jr

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20212:20-cv-09527California1,610 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

3

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

10 JARED MARTIN Case № 2:20-cv-09527-MWF-MAA 11 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGES vs. MICHAEL F. FITZGERALD AND MARIA

A. AUDERO MADE PURSUANT TO

R. FISHER, JR., U.S.C. §§ 144 [DE‐14.]

Respondent. 16 _______________________________

I.  INTRODUCTION On  September  28,  2020  Petitioner,  in  pro  se,    filed  a  Petition  for  Writ  of Habeas  Corpus  by  One  in  State  Custody  pursuant  to    U.S.C.§  2254.  [DE‐1].  In general,  Petitioner  alleged  prosecutorial  misconduct  in  pursuing  a  case  with  no victims or complaining witnesses, he contends he is actually innocent, his guilty plea (actually nolo contender) was entered due to ineffective assistance of his counsel who tricked him into admitting his guilt.  Id.  On October 21, 2020 the matter was referred to the calendar of Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero [DE‐3]. On  November  5,  2020  Magistrate …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.