Jared Martin v. Superior Court of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20212:19-cv-10839California1,636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

A 5 6 Gnited States District Court Central District of California 10 i JARED MARTIN Case Ne EYES □□ Petitioner, MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGES VS. MICHAEL F. FITZGERALD AND MARIA A. AUDERO MADE PURSUANT TO 28 Superior Court of California, U.S.C. §§ 144 [DE-33.]

Respondent.

18 I. INTRODUCTION On December 23, 2019 Petitioner, in pro se, _ filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by One in State Custody pursuant to U.S.C.§ 2254. [DE-1]. general, Petitioner alleged prosecutorial misconduct in pursuing a case with nc victims or complaining witnesses, he contends he is actually innocent, his guilty ple (actually nolo contender) was entered due to ineffective assistance of his counsel who tricked him into admitting his guilt. /d. On December 23, 2019 the matte was referred to the calendar of Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judg…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.