Mary Rodgers-Vey v. Nancy A. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY R.-V., ) Case No. CV 19-2785-MWF (JPR) 11 ) Plaintiff, ) 12 ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. 13 ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner ) 14 of Social Security, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, Joint Stipulation, Administrative Record, and all other records on file as well as the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. On December 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the R. & R., in which she mostly simply repeats arguments from the Joint Stipulation.1 For instance, Plaintiff reiterates that the ALJ erred in failing to exhibit and consider a medical-source statement from treating doctor Russell W. Nelson opining that Plaintiff was 26 27 1 Defendant filed a response to the Objections on December 28, 2020. prohibited from repetitive twisting, turning, or bending, among other things. (See Objs. at 2-4.) As the Magistrate Judge found, however,…