Jesse Chacon Jr v. Ralph Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20215:20-cv-01898California856 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE CHACON, JR., ) NO. EDCV 20-1898-JWH (KS)

11 ) Plaintiff, ) v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED RALPH DIAZ, et al, ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

) Defendants. ) _________________________________

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the “Report”), and Plaintiff’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report (“Objections”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. The Objections largely reiterate Plaintiff’s earlier positions regarding the Magistrate Judge’s authority and the propriety of the Eastern District’s decision to transfer the action to the Central District. The remainder…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.