Sussex House Apartments v. Sohial Arout

J S 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sussex House Apartments, CASE NUMBER: 10 CV21-522 AB (E) Plaintiff V. 13 || Sohial Arout, et al.

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT ke Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the ||County of Frees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 || Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of 24 || Am.…