Wanda Lynn Stokes Narasky v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WANDA L. S.-N., Case No. EDCV 20-0772-RAO
Plaintiff,
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Wanda L. S.-N.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED. II. PROCEEDINGS BELOW On August 9, 2017, Plaintiff protectively filed a Title II application for DIB. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 9, 158-61.) Her application was denied initially on
Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. October 25, 2017 (AR…