Wanda Lynn Stokes Narasky v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20215:20-cv-00772California3,322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WANDA L. S.-N., Case No. EDCV 20-0772-RAO

Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Wanda L. S.-N.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED. II. PROCEEDINGS BELOW On August 9, 2017, Plaintiff protectively filed a Title II application for DIB. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 9, 158-61.) Her application was denied initially on

Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. October 25, 2017 (AR…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.