Omar Luna v. Thrifty Oil Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 OMAR LUNA, ) Case No. CV 20-10231 FMO (SKx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE THRIFTY OIL CO., ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) 16 On December 1, 2020, the court issued its Standing Order Re: ADA Accessibility Cases (see Dkt. 9, Court’s Order of December 1, 2020), which ordered plaintiff Omar Luna (“plaintiff”) to file a proof of service demonstrating service of the Complaint on all parties “within 93 days of the filing of the case absent a previously approved extension of time by the court.” (Id. at 2). The court admonished plaintiff that “failure to file the proof of service within 93 days after the filing of the case shall result in the dismissal of the action and/or the defendant that has not appeared in the case and for which plaintiff has not filed a proof of service.” (Id.) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S.…