April J. Michles v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20215:19-cv-00943California12,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS

17 On August 28, 2008, Plaintiff, formerly employed as a quality assurance and fingerprint clerk, a school aide, and a customer service representative (see AR 39-43, 253, 884-89), filed an application for Disability Insurance Benefits alleging a disability onset date of August 16, 2004. (See AR 220-23). Plaintiff’s application was denied, initially on December 16, 2008, and, on reconsideration on April 2, 2009. (See AR 100, 129-30). 25 December 3, 2010 Decision 27 On October 14, 2010, Plaintiff, represented by counsel, testified at a hearing before Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Charles E. Stevenson (“ALJ Stevenson”). (See AR 81-99). ALJ Stevenson also heard testimony from medical expert Samuel Nafisi and vocational expert Alan Boroskin. On December 3, 2010, ALJ Stevenson issued a decision denying Plaintiff’s request for benefits. (See AR 105-17). 5 Applying the five-step sequential process, ALJ Stevenson found at step one that Plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity from August 16, 2004, the alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.