Timothy Andrews v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20212:21-cv-00297California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I.

BACKGROUND

On January 13, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy A. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint challenging the denial of Plaintiff’s application for Title II Disability Insurance Benefits and/or Title XVI Supplemental Security Income by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1.

On January 14, 2021, the Court issued a Case Management Order (“CMO”) instructing Plaintiff to “promptly serve the summons and complaint on the Commissioner,” and to “electronically file a proof of service” within thirty (30) days after the filing of the Complaint, i.e. no later than February 16, 2021. Dkt. 7 at 1–2. The CMO warned Plaintiff that failure to follow those instructions “may result in dismissal of this case.” Id. at 2.

As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff still has not filed a proof of service, per the Court’s

CMO.

///

Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States.

II.

DISCUSSION

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (“Rule 41(b)”), the Court may dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.