Maria Del Rosario Elizarraraz v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20215:19-cv-00982California3,898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA DEL ROSARIO E., Case No. 5:19-cv-00982-KES

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v.

ORDER

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant.

I.

BACKGROUND

In December 2014, Plaintiff Maria Del Rosario E. (“Plaintiff”) applied for

Title II disability benefits alleging an onset date of March 13, 2013 (age 42), the date on which she fell at work and broke her left kneecap. Administrative Record (“AR”) 56, 59, 224. On May 7, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) conducted a hearing at which Plaintiff, who was represented by counsel, appeared 24 1 Andrew Saul is substituted for his predecessor, Nancy Berryhill. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 2 While Plaintiff testified that she has not worked since March 2013 (AR 58), in August 2014, she told Kaiser that “she has a lot of anxiety recently at work.” AR 423, 683. 28 and testified along with a vocational expert…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.