Romaine L. Nevels v. Debbie Ascunion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 ROMAINE L. NEVELS, CASE NO. CV 17-6434-JVS (AS) Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DEBBIE ASCUNION, et al.,

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Defendants.

JUDGE

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 18 Third Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report 19 and Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge. After 20 having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report 21 and Recommendation to which the parties’ Objections were directed, 22 the Court finds that Defendants’ and Plaintiff’s respective 23 Objections to the Report and Recommendation are without merit and 24 do not cause the Court to reconsider its decision to accept the 25 Magistrate Judge’s conclusions and recommendations. 26 27 28 Defendants argue in their Objections that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to any Defendant, including Avalos, because he never received a…