Pollard
Daniel Calderon v. Pollard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CALDERON, Case No. 5:20-cv-01960-RGK-PD
Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND ADOPTING, FINDINGS,
v.
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF MARCUS POLLARD, Warden,
UNITED STATES
15 Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to that Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. …