Pollard

Daniel Calderon v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20215:20-cv-01960California240 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CALDERON, Case No. 5:20-cv-01960-RGK-PD

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND ADOPTING, FINDINGS,

v.

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF MARCUS POLLARD, Warden,

UNITED STATES

15 Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to that Report. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.