Dario Antonic v. Kevin McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20215:20-cv-00110California747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARIO ANTONIC, Case No. 5:20-cv-00110-GW-MAA Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

AS MOOT AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; KEVIN MCALEENAN, Secretary of DENYING MOTIONS TO Homeland Security, et al., EXPEDITE AS MOOT 15 Respondents. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On January 15, 2020, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Section 2241”) (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 2.) Petitioner raises one claim for Section 2241 relief: that his continued immigration detention violates due process under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). (Pet. 2, 6.1) On March 20, 2020, Respondents filed an Answer, including a Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and supporting Exhibits. (Answer, ECF No. 10; Exs., ECF Nos. 10-1 to 10-3.) On April 3, 2020, Petitioner filed a “Motion to Add 27 1 Pinpoint citations in this Order refer to the page numbers appearing in the ECF- 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.