Catherine Padilla v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 12 CATHERINE P., Case No. 2:20-cv-00481-PD 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant.
20 Plaintiff challenges the Commissioner’s denial of her applications for 21 Disability Insurance Benefits and supplemental security income. For the 22 reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.
25 26 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United 28 States. I. PROCEEDINGS BELOW On March 24 and March 31, 2016, Plaintiff protectively filed applications for supplemental security income and period of disability and disability insurance benefits, alleging an inability to work since March 1, 2008. [Administrative Record (“AR”) 15, 200-211.] Her claim was denied in June 2016 and upon reconsideration in…