Amandip Kaur v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20215:19-cv-01346California10,951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMANDIP K., ) Case No. EDCV 19-1346-JPR 11 ) Plaintiff, ) 12 ) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. ) AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER 13 ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner ) 14 of Social Security, ) ) 15 Defendant. )

I. PROCEEDINGS

17 Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision 18 denying her application for Social Security disability insurance 19 benefits (“DIB”). The matter is before the Court on the parties’ 20 Joint Stipulation, filed June 8, 2020, which the Court has taken 21 under submission without oral argument. For the reasons stated 22 below, the Court recommends that the Commissioner’s decision be 23 affirmed. 24 25 26 1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in line with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was born in 1976. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 167.) She completed high school (AR 171) and worked as a 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.