Henry Edward Diaz, II v. Stu Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20212:20-cv-10934California234 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-10934 ODW (MRW) Date February 22, 2021 Title Diaz v. Sherman

Present: Hon. Michael R. Wilner, U.S. Magistrate Judge Veronica Piper n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys for Petitioner: Attorneys for Respondent: n/a n/a Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

1. In December 2020, the Attorney General moved to dismiss this habeas action as successive. (Docket # 5.) The Court issued an order requiring Petitioner to respond to the motion by January 15, 2021. (Docket #6.) To date, Petitioner has not filed any response to the motion or the Court’s order. 2. Petitioner is ordered to show cause why the motion should not be granted for the grounds stated by the Attorney General and for Petitioner’s failure to oppose the motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-12. Petitioner’s response to the OSC and his substantive response to the motion are due by or before March 19, 2021. Petitioner is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.