Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell v. D. Melo
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20212:20-cv-05935California680 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.: 2:20-05935 JFW (ADS) Date: February 24, 2021 Title: Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell v. D. Melo, et al.
Present: The Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge
Kristee Hopkins None Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR (1) FAILURE TO
EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES AND (2)
FAILURE TO FILE A COMPLETE REQUEST TO PROCEED
WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES
I. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
Plaintiff Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell, an inmate at California State Prison, Los Angeles County, filed a Civil Rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. [Dkt. No. 1]. Plaintiff’s handwritten complaint makes no reference to exhaustion of administrative remedies, and as such, it appears dismissal for failure to exhaust may be appropriate.
The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) requires that “no action shall be brought with…