Del Shawn Schoenhoeft v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 DEL SHAWN S., an Individual, Case No.: 2:19-10060 ADS
Plaintiff,
v.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Del Shawn S.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial of his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) improperly assessed his
23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. residual functional capacity. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. II. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL Plaintiff…