Rahim Rachman Davis v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20215:20-cv-00236California2,628 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAHIM R. D., ) EDCV 20-236-AGR ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) 14 ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) 15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff1 filed this action on February 5, 2020. On August 14, 2020, the parties 18 filed a Joint Stipulation that addressed the disputed issues. The court has taken the 19 matter under submission without oral argument.2 20 Having reviewed the entire file, the court reverses the decision of the 21 Commissioner. 22 23 24 25 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and 26 Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to proceed before the 28 1 I. 2 PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.