Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. Donald Stennett
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7
8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California
10
11 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, Case № 2:20-CV-07488-ODW (PLAx) 12 I NC., 13 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING CONSENT
PETITION TO CONFIRM
14 v.
ARBITRATION AWARD [1]
15 DONALD STENNETT,
16 Respondent. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND 19 On February 25, 2020, Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. 20 (“JAMS”), Hon. Steven J. Stone, (Ret.), issued a Findings of Fact, Conclusions of 21 Law, and Award (“Final Arbitration Award”) in the Arbitration of Donald Stennett’s 22 claims against his former employer, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (Consent Pet. 23 ¶ 14, Ex. B, ECF No. 1.) In the Final Arbitration Award, the arbitrator concluded that 24 Stennett had validly released all claims asserted against Halliburton and found in favor 25 of Halliburton on all of Stennett’s claims. (Id. ¶ 15, Ex. B.) By stipulation dated 26 July 21, 2020, Stennett and Halliburton consented to “having the [Final Arbitration] 27 Award confirmed by a court of competent jurisdiction,” and agreed “that there are…