Jack Gershfeld v. Teamviewer US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20218:21-cv-00058California1,242 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 CLERK, us oercr COURT

3 Vn CW □□□□□□ 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 11 || JACK GERSHFIELD, on behalf of Case No.: SACV 21-00058-CJC(ADSx) himself and all other similarly situated individuals, 13 14 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. 11] 15 Vv. '° || TEAMVIEWER US, INC., and DOES 17 || 1-100, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 || I. INTRODUCTION 23 24 Plaintiff Jack Gershfield brings this putative class action against Defendant 25 || Teamviewer US, Inc. and unnamed Does, alleging violations of California’s Unfair 26 || Competition Law (“UCL”) and California’s Consumer Privacy Act (““CCPA”). (Dkt. 1-1 27 || at 5 [Complaint, hereinafter “Compl.’’].) 28

1 On September 19, 2019, Plaintiff purchased a year-long subscription to 2 Defendant’s remote-access software. (Id. ¶ 13.) To complete the purchase, Plaintiff was 3 required to provide his name as well as his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.