Carlyle Lee Cole v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20212:21-cv-02015California328 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARLYLE LEE COLE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00269-HBK 12 Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13 v. (Doc. No. 1) 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is proceeding on his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 § 2241. (Doc. No. 1). Petitioner, a prisoner incarcerated in Santa Barbara County, which is located 19 within the jurisdiction and venue of the Western Division of the United States District Court for 20 the Central District of California, challenges his February 24, 2014 federal sentence and conviction 21 entered by the Fresno Division of this Court. 22 Here, Petitioner brings his claims under § 2241, pursuant to the savings clause of § 2255. 23 “[A] habeas petition filed pursuant to § 2241 must be heard in the custodial court . . . even if 24 the § 2241 petition contests the legality of a sentence by falling under the savings clause.” 25 Hernandez v. Campbell, 204 F.3d 861, 865…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.